An ISIS terrorist cell launched a “real” attack in Paris, killing and wounding scores of people.
But this terrorist cell was ultimately “semi-autonomous.” This was a carefully scripted, calculated and staged event.
The Drills. The absence of citizen photos and videos. The cry for Syria. The passports. The fake cafe sites. The crisis actors.
These terrorists were co-opted, prodded and “packaged” by a small group (a cult really) owing its allegiance to no real country, having no formal name, and operating off the radar screen in Europe, Canada and the United States.
This group is not overtly visible in politics, the military or the intelligence services, but it knows where these sectors have their pressure points.
While its first rule is never to be discovered, members are obliged to leave clues as to what they are up to.
These “controllers,” for lack of a better word, approvingly monitored terrorist movements and provided two-degrees-of-separation guidance. Weapons were stolen from a French military base. A Brussels support network was allowed to function. Crucially, the controllers sponsored a sophisticated cyber attack on French security two days before the event, opening opportunities.
The terrorists also received prodding to launch their attack on Friday the 13th at the Bataclan theater, whose significance is completely meaningless for any jihadist.
This is the first real clue that the terrorists were packaged. Drills for a multiple-site terrorist scenario coincided (again!) with an actual attack. Drills allow for the controllers to ensure that the police, military and first responders are positioned in certain locations and that they are not positioned in other locations.
Drills cloak operations from accidental discovery: “I can explain! I know this trunk is full of automatic weapons, but we are simply part of a drill!”
If the Paris attacks had all occurred entirely as reported, social media would have been flooded with gruesome photographs and videos: body parts strewn on the floor; organs hanging out of half-alive people; blood spurting from slashed arteries. The managers of Facebook, Instragram and other social media would have been powerless to hold back the tsunami of stomach-turning images.
Instead, what is the world left with? One photograph that came out a full day after the attack, in low resolution, taken long after the dust had settled on the theatre attack. It was not taken by an eye-witness but some kind of official or handler of the incident.
Supposedly, tens of thousands of people were involved as “witnesses” (almost all with cameras on their cell phones) and we have one major photograph that was released, by mainstream media, the next day.
Someone more skeptical than me might say that, with a few dozen cadavers and two 5-gallon buckets of blood, they could have reproduced a scene just as convincing in the same 24-hour period. The only argument this line of thinking really has is that, for the controllers, the larger the lie the better. And so if there were no casualties at all then this makes the feat even more impressive.
Personally, I think the theater witnessed casualties. There was deliberate evacuation of most people (who ran out when gunfire sounded to clear the place) and the actual re-introduction of other people, would-be victims. So the operation would have proceeded in distinct and calculated phases. The last phase of killing would have only occurred at the very end, with the theater effectively locked down, no cameras present, and the stage adequately set.
“This is for Syria!”
This is ludicrous. Muslim extremists are opposed to the Syrian government so why would they shout this? Was this because they believed France was not doing enough to support the rebel cause? Having been sidelined by recent events?
This is a manufactured statement, invented to raise public support for a NATO invasion of Syria.
Astoundingly, two of the suicide bombers were carrying passports (real or fake), Syrian and Egyptian.
More astoundingly, these passports survived the explosion intact.
This reminded me of the discovery of a hijackers passport in the rubble of 9/11 (as the only item from the passenger compartment to make it out of the fireball).
Mixed Real and Fake Attacks
In addition to the theatre attack – which in the interests of caution we will assume actually happened – the controllers are trying to leave more clues by including fake sites.
One Café that supposedly witnessed a bombing shows no real damage. A few tables and chairs were overturned. Later, a rent-a-cadaver was displayed. The forensic expert (crisis actor?) who showed up to inspect things was smoking a cigarette.
Here, the controllers are not only leaving a clue but also making an inside joke (more like laughing in our faces). Some of the same crisis actors who appeared in previous productions are being paraded around, for show.
These crisis actors are emotional basket cases and are rarely taken off their leashes. They live to perform. Literally.
From Yahoo’s front page
My favorite crisis actor (above) was displayed on the homepage of Yahoo.com! This young woman has been spotted by many of us multiple times. This is not a mistake. The controllers are not being sloppy. They just want to be sure we have their business cards.
Forget Kenya, forget Beirut. Apparently Paris is the center of world civilization.
The politicians, bureaucrats and generals we see have nothing to do with packaging terrorism. They are merely stooges. A few of them need a nudge from time to time (the usual blackmail or bribery).
Muslims everywhere are insisting that the Paris attack does not represent their religion. But why is their claim that the attack is “un-Islamic” more valid that the jihadist claim? Who represents Islam? It’s a big tent religion, apparently, with room for all kinds of atrocities.
The Christian evangelicals now lighting up social media are inspired, not by the struggle to end tyranny, but by the quickening pace of the End Times. Rapture Ready! Talk about a “stand down” religion!
Don’t hold your breath.
Christians are waiting for the Second Coming of Jesus – oblivious to the fact that there was no First Coming. He was never here. So it’s gonna be a long wait…
On the Sunday talk shows, the usual Zionist warmongers have come out of the woodwork, imploring the world to attack Syria. Their sense of gravitas suggests they believe themselves to be at the top of the pyramid. But they are not. To the controllers, they are as disposable as the jihadist suicide bomber.
It seems so obvious: the terrorist attack on Paris was carefully packaged. About 5 – 10% of western populations think similarly. They know that mainstream media and politicians cannot stop lying.
This begs the question: Why have Russia and China remained silent on this and other attacks? Silence is consent, after all. There are three possibilities.
First, Russia and China have perhaps merged, or are hoping to merge, with the highest grid of global power. This would mean that they have been co-opted and will not challenge the official version of events.
Second, Russia and China perhaps remain unaware of the behind-the-scene and above-the-scene operations in Paris and elsewhere. In this scenario, these governments have no access to information other than what the western media offers on a spoon.
The first two scenarios are quite negative, implying that these “silent powers” are either 1) corrupt or 2) ignorant. So let us hope they are false scenarios, because there is a lot at stake.
This world is an obstacle course, and we are failing. We are in the Aztec Fifth World, and it’s the last one. There will not be a Sixth try. The human experiment will end. Game over.
Meantime, if there is ever a digital document dump (even by the controllers themselves, since this is a game), and Russia and China are discovered to have been silent on the matter of synthetic terror, then the entire Security Council, with all five permanent members, would (and should) collapse.
There is a third possibility. I’m not quite sure what it is. But the first and second possibilities are so discouraging that I’m hoping there is a “known unknown” in this scene. I’m hoping that I’m blind to something important.
The Paris attacks are the product of collusion between two forces.
On the one hand, we have a semi-autonomous terrorist group, with a deep hatred of the West and an addiction to violence. These are probably the easiest people on the planet to manipulate.
On the other hand, we have a cult of controllers, considerably smarter and more capable than the ordinary humans they sometimes puppet, with allegiance to no nation, and to no religion, who left numerous clues as to their handiwork.
Their agenda is simple: to tighten up the matrix of global enslavement, with an eye on exterminating most of the human race.